The question
What is the difference between humans and animals? It seems to
be
important to we humans to separate ourselves from animals. We must
prove we are superior to that which we eat or subjugate to our will.
Wrong answers
Is it the use of tools? No, It has been proven that some animals use
what can only be described as tools to do things. Some monkeys use
sticks to get at fruit. Birds use rocks to break shells of
invertebrates. Some fish do the same.
Is it collective creativity? No. Ant hills, bee hives, herds, packs,
schools, all collective cooperation for a common goal. Our societies
are more chaotic and crime ridden than any of these groups.
Is it transportation? No. No animals build their own transportation
as far as I know, but they will use what is available and hitch rides
with each other. That is how humans got started with transportation.
Is it the thumb? No, What is to stop a dog from saying a tail makes
him a superior being when they get around to talking? Just because we
can grasp things and rotate them with greater ease than some other
animals, doesn't make us a higher life form. If this is the case,
elephants have us beat.
Is it religion? I hope not. Some would say religion should bring
humans down a notch from the animals. Who is to say our pets don't
warship us or each other. Or that very special tree, or all things that
go squeak.
Is it murder? No. Animals will kill their own kind. I've even heard
of a psychotic female monkey killing other pregnant females for no
apparent reason.
Is it laughter or sadness or morning or glee or any reaction to any
emotion? No. It could be said that animals have responses to most or
all of the same range of emotions as humans. Maybe even some that we do
not understand.
The question is the answer?
Is it because we ponder the very question? This is possibly
the
closest one yet. I still say no because how do I know what thoughts or
passions pass a creature's mind while slipping through cold dark quiet
waters between meals and mating. Until we can discuss the
question
with another animal, I have to say this one misses the target as well.
This is really a cop-out answer. Someone who is well versed in
acting and animal psychology should play the part of animals and argue
the point for them. I would like to witness this debate. Humans vs
animals, which is superior? Which deserves 95% of the world's resources?
The real answer
Humans are not superior to so called lower animals. We are simply
tuned higher in many attributes. We are smarter. We are more capable of
adaptation. That is we adapt our environment to fit us in stead of the
other way round. We communicate in a complex manor. Yadda yadda.
Why are we obsessed with calling ourselves higher than other things and each other? Is life more important to the universe than a rock? I doubt it.
No comments:
Post a Comment