I heard a story this morning about a couple guys who were busted
transporting marijuana plants. As the story progressed, I picked some
bits up. The people were moving the plants after a break in to their
house the previous night. I would like to know if the house thieves
told the cops about the plants and the cops started survailing the
suspects. If so, do the plant possessors have a case for dismissal
because the police only started watching them after learning of their
crime by the commission of an unrelated crime?
That is not entrapment. There is a name for finding out about one
crime by the act of another unrelated crime. I can't think of it. I'm
not a lawyer. This is a legitimate way to bust people I believe, but
this situation could be worse.
When I put my writer's hat on (fiction) I envision the cops rousting
a known hose thief and coaxing him to hit this known house of
ill-plant-growing repute in order to find out if they are indeed
growing marijuana.
This would make a much better story than say, the idiots were
transporting the plants in an open pickup right down main street. You
know, past the police station. That would make for too short fiction.
Hasn't every cop and lawyer show in history done this same plot to
death? I would try to think of examples, but it is just plane cliché.
This brings up a question I've had for a long time. Why is there so
much lawyer and cop fiction? The genera I'm really sick of is writers
writing about writing. The next is lawyer and cop stories. I do not
have a problem with them on a philosophical level. I'm just sick to
death of them. I include CSI and investigative shows under that
umbrella.
I remember a show about a bus driver that was pretty good called The
Honeymooners. Is there another profession or industry besides the two above that has nearly as many active stories written and produced about them? I think not. It seems everything is about writers, actors, producers, cops, lawyers, and criminals.
No comments:
Post a Comment