Linux Question
I to a bunch of testing over the network at my job. This is nothing
special Every software company does it. My current method of testing is
to ssh into a host machine and pop up a bunch of tests running in xterm
windows. If anything happens to the network on either end, the whole
test suite goes ka-flooy.
I've experimented with running on the local system. That is far more
stable of course. If I VNC into the local box, kick off the test. Then
disconnect VNC. Then reconnect via VNC when I want to check up on the
progress. Is this any more stable? I know VNC is not the most stable
program. But if it is not actively talking over the network, will it
still crash, or leave the processes running regardless of network
activity?
I'm going to have to run some tests. I need to do this on a box and
unplug it from the network for a half hour or so. Then, plug it back in
and try to connect. If the tests are still running, I may have a more
stable method of running my tests. The act of unplugging the network
would kill all the xterms over the network thus killing all my tests.
I just don't trust VNC as far as I can throw flaming Dell laptop. It is
good for some thing, but just not very stable in the long run. I cannot
bring myself to even think it is the more stable solution in any case.
How is that for program prejudice?
It wasn't me. You can't prove anything.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment